Lindsay Lohan had breast augmentation at 17? Now, thats an unsettling thought! Whyd a girl in her teens do such an absurd thing? But, whatever the case, her twin assets are hogging the headlines in all the leading magazines for quite sometime now and the question is whether theyre real or fake.
There are many proponents for Lindsay having falsies and chief amongst them is Dr. Wallace Goodstein, the Beverly Hills plastic surgeon, who according to the Star says, “Theres no question in my mind that she has had breast augmentation, and I think the results are very good.” And there are some diehard defenders too, like Leslie Sloane Zelnick, who maintains that this rumor is perverse and that her physical attributes are 100% real. Of course, this lady also happens to be Lohans rep.
Now, whats adding fuel to the fire in this debate are cleavage-revealing pictures of Lindsay, which unmistakably show a small scar under one of her boobs. Well, some think this could be the result of surgical scarring. However, the location seems unlikely, as plastic surgeons dont put any scars in the cleavage area; they generally go in the middle under the crease. Still another shows her dancing with her arms raised, but what catches the attention are her breasts. Do real breasts go up to your neck when you raise your arms? Well, no comments.
But why would a relatively successful actress need big hooters? And besides the 2 to 4-week healing time that breast augmentation surgery requires, just doesnt fit into the kind of schedule Lindsays been keeping that of public appearances and photo shoots. In the absence of surgeons bill or a definitive scar (not the one in Lindsays picture doing the rounds), youd be better off taking Lindsay’s word for it and not brew a storm in a D-cup!
Duration : 0:0:30
Read the rest of this entry »